Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ken Sternberg c05ff4cca1 web: add radius to application wizard
This commit continues the application wizard buildout.  In this commit are the following changes:

- Fixed a width-setting bug in the Makefile `make help` feature (i.e "automate that stuff!")
- Added Radius to the list of providers we can offer via the wizard
- Added `launchUrl` and `UI Settings` to features of the application page the wizard can find
- Changed 'SAML Manual Configuration' to just say "SAML Configuration"
- Modified `ak-form-group` to take and honor the `aria-label` property (which in turn makes it
  easier to target specific forms with unit testing)
- Reduced the log level for wdio to 'warn'; 'info' was super-spammy and not helpful.  It can be put
  back with `--logLevel info` from the command line.
2023-09-27 15:30:56 -07:00
Ken Sternberg f2ba927d34 This commit continues the application wizard buildout. In this commit are the following changes:
- Added SCIM to the list of available providers
- Fixed ForwardProxy so that its mode is set correctly.  (This is a special case in the committer;
  I'm unhappy with that.)
- Fixed the commit messages so that:
  - icons are set correctly (Success, Danger, Working)
  - icons are colored correctly according to state
  - commit message includes a `data-commit-state` field so tests can find it!
- Merged the application wizard tests into a single test pass
- Isolated common parts of the application wizard tests to reduce unnecessary repetition.  All
  application tests are the same until you reach the provider section anyway.
- Fixed the unit tests so they're finding the right error messages and are enabled to display them
  correctly.
- Moved the test Form handlers into their own folder so they're not cluttering up the Pages folder.
2023-09-26 15:15:47 -07:00
Ken Sternberg 7e6a9fd3d2 web: test LDAP wizard sequence 2023-09-25 15:46:19 -07:00
Ken Sternberg 0a43ea286e web: revise tests for wizard
This commit replaces the previous WDIO instance with a more formal and straightforward process using
the [pageobjects](https://martinfowler.com/bliki/PageObject.html).  In this form, every major
component has its own test suite, and a test is a sequence of exercises of those components.

A test then becomes something as straightforward as:

```
        await LoginPage.open();
        await LoginPage.login("ken@goauthentik.io", "eat10bugs");

        expect(await UserLibraryPage.pageHeader).toHaveText("My Applications");
        await UserLibraryPage.goToAdmin();

        expect(await AdminOverviewPage.pageHeader).toHaveText("Welcome, ");
        await AdminOverviewPage.openApplicationsListPage();

        expect(await ApplicationsListPage.pageHeader).toHaveText("Applications");
        ApplicationsListPage.startCreateApplicationWizard();

        await ApplicationWizard.app.name.setValue(`Test application ${newId}`);
        await ApplicationWizard.nextButton.click();
        await (await ApplicationWizard.getProviderType("ldapprovider")).click();
        await ApplicationWizard.nextButton.click();
        await ApplicationWizard.ldap.setBindFlow("default-authentication-flow");
        await ApplicationWizard.nextButton.click();
        await expect(await ApplicationWizard.commitMessage).toHaveText(
            "Your application has been saved"
        );
```

Whether or not there's another layer of DSL in there or not, this is a pretty nice idiom for
maintaining tests.
2023-09-21 14:46:09 -07:00