This commit adds WebdriverIO as an end-to-end solution to unit testing. WebdriverIO can be run both
locally and remotely, supports strong integration with web components, and is generally robust for
use in pipelines. I'll confess to working through a tutorial on how to do this for web components,
and this is just chapter 2 (I think there are 5 or so chapters...).
There's a makefile, with help! If you just run `make` it tells you:
```
Specify a command. The choices are:
help Show this help
node_modules Runs `npm install` to prepare this feature
precommit Run the precommit: spell check all comments, eslint with sonarJS, prettier-write
test-good-login Test that we can log into the server. Requires a running instance of the server.
test-bad-login Test that bad usernames and passwords create appropriate error messages
```
... because Makefiles are documentation, and documentation belongs in Makefiles.
I've chosen to go with a PageObject-oriented low-level DSL; what that means is that for each major
components (a page, a form, a wizard), there's a class that provides human-readable names for
human-interactable and human-viewable objects on the page. The LoginPage object, for example, has
selectors for the username, password, submit button, and the failure alert; accessing those allows
us to test for items as expected., and to write a DSL for "a good login" that's as straightforward
as:
```
await LoginPage.open();
await LoginPage.login("ken@goauthentik.io", "eat10bugs");
await expect(UserLibraryPage.pageHeader).toHaveText("My applications");
```
There was a *lot* of messing around with the LoginPage to get the username and password into the
system. For example, I had to do this with all the `waitForClickable` and `waitForEnable` because
we both keep the buttons inaccessible until the form has something and we "black out" the page (put
a darkening filter over it) while accessing the flow, meaning there was a race condition such that
the test would attempt to interact with the username or password field before it was accessible.
But this works now, which is very nice.
``` JavaScript
get inputUsername() {
return $('>>>input[name="uidField"]');
}
get btnSubmit() {
return $('>>>button[type="submit"]');
}
async username(username: string) {
await this.inputUsername.waitForClickable();
await this.inputUsername.setValue(username);
await this.btnSubmit.waitForEnabled();
await this.btnSubmit.click();
}
```
The bells & whistles of *Prettier*, *Eslint*, and *Codespell* have also been enabled. I do like my
guardrails.
web/improve testability
This is a trio of small hacks that allow the E2E tests to find several components
on the page while the test is running:
- Add a `data-managed-for` field to SearchSelect's positioned elements. If a search
has a `name` field, it will be reflected here, allowing tests to find specific
instances of the dropdown elements.
- Add a forwarder to the search select wrappers we use for our SearchSelect.
- Added aria details to the UserLibrary header to make it easy to identify.
* Web: Detangling some circular dependencies in Admin and User
Admin, User, and Flow should not dependend upon each other, at least
not in a circular way. If Admin and User depend on Flow, that's
fine, but Flow should not correspondingly depend upon elements of
either; if they have something in common, let's put them in
`@goauthentik/common` or find some other smart place to store them.
This commit refactors the intentToLabel and actionToLabel functions
into `@goauthentik/common/labels` and converts them to static tables
for maintenance purposes.
* web: "Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds" - Ralph Waldo Emerson
* web: I found these confusing to look at, so I added comments.
* web: remove admin-to-user component reference(s)
There was only one: AppIcon. This has been moved to `components`.
Touching the LibraryApplications page triggered a cyclomatic
complexity check. Extracting the expansion block and streamlining
the class and style declarations with lit directives helped.
* web: remove admin from elements
This commit removes the two references from `elements` to `admin`: the list of UserEvents and a
reference to the FlowSearch type, used by the Forms manager to decide how to extract a value.
For FlowSearch, a different convention for detecting the type was implemented (instances of the
object have a unique fieldname for the value holder). UserEvents and ObjectChangelog have been
moved to `components` as they're clearly dependent upon the API.
This defers work on removing Admin from Components, as that is (again) references going the
wrong way, but that can happen later.
* web: remove admin-to-user component reference(s) (#6856)
There was only one: AppIcon. This has been moved to `components`.
Touching the LibraryApplications page triggered a cyclomatic
complexity check. Extracting the expansion block and streamlining
the class and style declarations with lit directives helped.
* This was supposed to be merged.
* web: remove `./element`⇢`./user` references
The offender here is UserDevicesList, which despite being in `elements` is only
used by the admin/user/UserViewPage. The problem is that UserDevicesList,
despite being in `admin`, inherits from `user`, so moving it would have created
a new admin⇢user reference, and the whole point of this exercise is to get rid
of references that point "up" from the foundational pieces to the views, or
that refer to components in sibling applications.
After examining UserDevicesList, I realized that *every feature* of MFADevicesList
had been overridden: the rows, the columns, the toolbar, and the endpoint all had
custom overrides. Nothing was left of MFADevicesList after that. Even the
property that the web component used had been completely changed. The only thing
they had in common was that they both inherited from `Table<Device>`.
Refactoring UserDevicesList so that it inherited directly from `Table<Device>` and
then moving it into `./admin/users` was the obvious and correct step.
Both used the same label table, so that went into the `common/labels` folder.
Along the way, I cleaned up a few minor details. Just little things, like the repeated invocation
of:
```
new AuthenticatorsApi(DEFAULT_CONFIG).authenticatorAdminMETHODDestroy({ id: device.pk });
```
This is repeated five times, once for each Method. By creating these:
```
const api = new AuthenticatorsApi(DEFAULT_CONFIG);
const id = { id: device.pk };
```
The method invocation could be just `api.authenticatorsMETHODDestroy(id)`, which is easier on the
eyes. See the MFADevicesPage for the full example.
Similarly,
```
return [
new TableColumn(msg("Name"), ""),
new TableColumn(msg("Type"), ""),
new TableColumn("")
];
```
is more straightforward as:
```
const headers = [msg("Name"), msg("Type"), ""];
return headers.map((th) => new TableColumn(th, ""));
```
We've labeled what we're working with, and web developers ought to know that `th` is the HTML code
for `table header`.
I've had to alter what files are scanned in pre-commit mode; it doesn't handle renamed files very well,
and at the moment a file that is renamed is not scanned, as its "new" name is not straightforwardly
displayed, not even by `git porcelain`.
* web: make the table of column headers look like a table
* web: detangle `common` from `elements`.
And just like that, `common` no longer has a reference to `elements`. I don't mind this little bit of
code duplication if it removes a cycle. What it does point out is that there are bits of `common` that
are predicated on the presence of the browser, and that there are bits of `elements` that, if they rely
on `common`, can't be disentangled from the application as a whole. Which seems to me that we have two
different things going on in common: things about an application, and things about elements that are
independent of the application.
I'll think about those later.
```
$ rg 'import.*@goauthentik' ./common/ | perl -ne 'm{"(@goauthentik[^"]*)"} && print "$1\n"' | sort | cut -d '/' -f1-2 | uniq | sort
@goauthentik/api
@goauthentik/common
$
```
* web: odd bug; merge-related? Gonna investigate.
* web: build failure thanks to local cache; fixed
* web: detangle `components` from `admin`.
This was the last inappropriate reference: something from `./components` referencing something in
`./admin`, in this case the `ak-event-info` component. Used by both Users and Admin, moving it
into `./components` was the obvious correct step.
`ak-event-info` is a lookup table relating specific events in the event log to rich, textual
representations; in the special case of model changes and email info, even more rich content is
available in a dl/dt format. I've tableized the model changes and email info renderer, and I've
extracted every event's textual representation into its own method, converting the `switch/case`
rendering statement into a `switch/case` dispatch switch. This has the virtue of isolating each
unique case and making the dispatch switch short and coherent.
The conversion was done mechanistically; I gave the refactorer (Tide, in this case) instructions to
duplicate the switch block and then convert every case into a method with a name patterned on the
`case`. Going back to the original switch block, it was easy to duplicate the pattern matching and
convert it into a dispatch switch.
And with this, there are zero cycles in the references between the different "packageable" sections
of the UI. The only thing left to do is figure out how to redistribute `./elements` and `./components`
in a way that makes sense for each.
* Changed function name from 'emailMessageBody' to 'githubIssueMessageBody' to better reflect its usage.
* web: added comments about length and purpose of githubIssueMessageBody.
* Update web/src/common/labels.ts
Co-authored-by: Jens L. <jens@goauthentik.io>
Signed-off-by: Ken Sternberg <133134217+kensternberg-authentik@users.noreply.github.com>
* Unwanted change.
* web/add tooltip buttons to user details page
This commit wraps the command buttons on the UserDetailsPage with tooltips providing greater copy
explaining what each button does. It also ensures that every button is a minimum of 11ems in width
(The longest phrase, 'Reset Password', results in a width of 10.75ems; this makes them all
consistent.)
The technique for giving the `ak-action-button` objects a mininum width uses the CSS `::part()`
syntax, which is new. CanIUse shows that it's at 95.3% of global usage; our weak points remain Opera
Mini and UC Browser for Android.
Oh, and IE. But the various Powers That Be™ agree we're no longer tracking or caring about IE.
* I added some text, so it's my responibility to add the language files.
* fix text
Signed-off-by: Jens Langhammer <jens@goauthentik.io>
* rework
Signed-off-by: Jens Langhammer <jens@goauthentik.io>
* web: enforce a max-width on the container for the buttons so that they don't look funky on ultrawide monitors.
* wbe: re-ran and confirmed prettier.
---------
Signed-off-by: Ken Sternberg <133134217+kensternberg-authentik@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Langhammer <jens@goauthentik.io>
Co-authored-by: Jens L. <jens@goauthentik.io>
Jens Langhammer
Ken Sternberg
Marc 'risson' Schmitt
Ken Sternberg
dependabot[bot]
boesr
Tana M Berry
authentik-automation[bot]
transifex-integration[bot]